EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT ORGANZA MESH FOR TOMATO PRODUCTION UNDER A LOW TUNNEL

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31413/nat.v14i1.20388


Palabras clave:

Solanum lycopersicum L., protective nets, productivity, protected cultivation, fruit quality

Resumen

New non-agricultural materials, such as organza, have been tested in research and emerge as an innovative approach for tomato cultivation in tropical regions. This study assessed the effectiveness of various organza mesh types in low tunnels, specifically comparing voile organza, crystal organza, and open field conditions, using two determinate tomato hybrids (Fascínio and Thaíse). The main factors analyzed included environmental parameters, production metrics, physical fruit characteristics, and biochemical attributes. Results showed that air temperatures were lowest in the voile organza environment, with similar trends in light intensity, leaf, and fruit temperatures. Both organza types achieved higher commercial and total production compared to open field cultivation, with increases in commercial production of up to 52.2%, along with greater percentages of commercial fruits, total mass, and commercial mass. Biochemical analysis indicated that total soluble solids, lycopene, and β-carotene levels were higher in open field tomatoes. Thaíse exhibited a greater percentage of commercial fruits, while Fascínio had higher levels of lycopene and β-carotene. Despite some biochemical attributes being superior in open field tomatoes, the overall advantages of protected cultivation highlight its viability for optimizing tomato production in challenging climates.

Keywords: Solanum lycopersicum L.; protective nets; protected cultivation; fruit quality.

Referencias

ABREU, A. C.; MARÍN, P.; AGUILERA-SÁEZ, L. M.; TRISTÁN, A. I.; PEÑA, A.; OLIVEIRA, I.; SIMÕES, M.; VALERA, D.; FERNÁNDEZ, I. Effect of a shading mesh on the metabolic, nutritional, and defense profiles of harvested greenhouse-grown organic tomato fruits and leaves revealed by NMR metabolomics. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, v. 67, n. 46, p. 12972-12985, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b05657

ALVARENGA, M. A. R. Tomate: Produção em campo, casa de vegetação e hidroponia. Lavras: UFLA, 2013. 455p.

AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. Methods 925.10, 65.17, 974.24, 992.16. 17th Edition, The Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2020. Available at: https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1687699. Accessed on: 15 Jun. 2025.

ARAYA, N. A.; CHILOANE, T. S.; RAKUAMBO, J. Z.; MABOKO, M. M.; PLOOY, C. P.; AMOO, S. O. Effect of environmental variability on fruit quality and phytochemical content of soilless-grown tomato cultivars in a non-temperature-controlled high tunnel. Scientia Horticulturae, v. 288, e110378, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110378

BEER, K.; SINGH, A.; RAVI, S. C.; GUPTA, A. K.; KUMAR, A.; SHARMA, M. M. A comprehensive review on the role of Vitamin A on human health and nutrition. Journal of Environmental Biology, v. 45, n. 6, p. 645-653, 2024. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/45/6/mrn-5339

BEZERRA, C. S.; CASTRO, J. S.; ROMANO, M. L. P. C.; OTANI, F. S. Caracterização físico-química de tomate italiano produzidos na região Oeste do Pará. Revista Agroecossistemas, v. 10, n. 2, p. 37-49, 2018. https://doi.org/10.18542/ragros.v10i2.5182

CARVALHO, C. R. F.; PONCIANO, N. J.; SOUZA, P. M.; SOUZA, C. L. M.; SOUSA, E. F. Viabilidade econômica e de risco da produção de tomate no município de Cambuci/RJ, Brasil. Ciência Rural, v. 44, n. 12, p. 2293-2299, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20131570

DOUST, J. R.; NAZARIDELJOU, M. J.; ARSHAD, M.; FERRANTE, A. Comparison of the growth, physio-biochemical characteristics, and quality indices in Soilless-Grown strawberries under greenhouse and open-field conditions. Horticulturae, v. 9, n. 7, e0774, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9070774

FAOSTAT. Crops and livestock products. Production quantities of tomatoes by country. Faostat, 2025. Available at: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize. Accessed on: 20 Jun. 2025.

FERNÁNDEZ, J. A.; ORSINI, F.; BAEZA, E.; OZTEKIN, G. B.; MUÑOZ, P.; CONTRERAS, J.; MONTERO, J. I. Current trends in protected cultivation in Mediterranean climates. European Journal of Horticultural Science, v. 83, n. 5, p. 294-305, 2018. https://doi.org/10.17660/ejhs.2018/83.5.3

FILGUEIRA, F. A. R. Novo Manual de Olericultura: Agrotecnologia moderna na produção e comercialização de hortaliças. Viçosa: UFV, 2013. 537p.

HEUVELINK, E.; ACEVEDO-SIACA, L. G.; POEL, B. V.; VAN DER JEUCHT, L.; VIALET-CHABRAND, S.; STEPPE, K.; JI, Y.; KÖRNER, O.; KUSUMA, P.; LANGER, S.; LI, T.; VAN IEPEREN, W.; VERDONK, J. C.; ZEPEDA, A. C.; ZHANG, Y.; MARCELIS, L. F. M. Tomato in the spotlight: light regulation of whole-plant physiology. Journal of Experimental Botany, v. 76, n. 21, p. 6289-6310, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf315

KAPOOR, L.; SIMKIN, A. J.; GEORGE PRIYA DOSS, C.; SIVA, R. Fruit ripening: dynamics and integrated analysis of carotenoids and anthocyanins. BMC Plant Biology, v. 22, a27, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03411-w

LI, N.; WU, X.; ZHUANG, W.; XIA, L.; CHEN, Y.; WU, C.; RAO, Z.; DU, L.; ZHAO, R.; YI, M.; WAN, Q.; ZHOU, Y. Tomato and lycopene and multiple health outcomes: Umbrella review. Food Chemistry, v. 343, p. e128396, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128396

MAHMOOD, A.; HU, Y.; TANNY, J.; ASANTE, E. A. Effects of shading and insect-proof screens on crop microclimate and production: A review of recent advances. Scientia Horticulturae, v. 241, p. 241-251, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.06.078

MURARIU, O. C.; BREZEANU, C.; JITĂREANU, C. D.; ROBU, T.; IRIMIA, L. M.; TROFIN, A. E.; POPA, L.-D.; STOLERU, V.; MURARIU, F.; BREZEANU, P. M. Functional quality of improved tomato genotypes grown in open field and in plastic tunnel under organic farming. Agriculture, v. 11, n. 7, a609, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11070609

NAGATA, M.; YAMASHITA, I. Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi, v. 39, n. 10, p. 925-928, 1992. https://doi.org/10.3136/nskkk1962.39.925

ODEDIRAN, A.; YU, J.; GU, S. The effect of layers of high tunnel covering and soil mulching on tomato fruit quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, v. 103, n. 14, p. 7176-7186, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12805

PAULA, J. T.; FARIA, J. T. R. M. V.; FIGUEIREDO, A. S.; SCHWARZ, K.; NEUMANN, E. R. Características físico-químicas e compostos bioativos em frutos de tomateiro colhidos em diferentes estádios de maturação. Horticultura Brasileira, v. 33, n. 4, p. 434-440, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-053620150000400005

SANTOS, J. S.; FIGUEIREDO, S. N.; RAMOS, V. C.; SANTANA, S. F.; CERQUEIRA, R. M. S.; SILVA, J. M.; OLIVEIRA JÚNIOR, L. F. G.; FREITAS, M. I. Qualidade pós-colheita de duas variedades de tomates. Revista Craibeiras de Agroecologia, v. 3, p. 1-5, 2018.

SCHWARZ, K.; RESENDE, J. T. V.; PRECZENHAK, A. P.; PAULA, J. T.; FARIA, M. V.; DIAS, D. M. Desempenho agronômico e qualidade físico-química de híbridos de tomateiro em cultivo rasteiro. Horticultura Brasileira, v. 31, n. 3, p. 410-418, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-05362013000300011

SCOTT, D. H.; LAWRENCE, F. J. Strawberries. In: JANICK, J.; MOORE, N. M. (Eds). Advances in fruit breeding. Indiana: Purdue University Press, 1975. p. 71-97.

SEABRA JÚNIOR, S.; PONCE, F. S.; TOLEDO, C. A. L.; ZANUZZO, M. R.; DALLACORT, R.; LIMA, G. P. P. Does knitted shade provide temperature reduction and increase yield kale? Journal of Agricultural Science, v. 11, n. 9, p. 103-111, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v11n9p103

SEABRA JÚNIOR, S.; CASAGRANDE, J. G.; TOLEDO, C. A. de L.; PONCE, F. S.; FERREIRA, F. S.; ZANUZO, M. R.; DIAMANTE, M. S.; LIMA, G. P. P. Selection of thermotolerant Italian tomato cultivars with high fruit yield and nutritional quality for the consumer taste grown under protected cultivation. Scientia Horticulturae, v. 291, p. e110559, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110559

SHAMSHIRI, R. R.; JONES, J. W.; THORP, K. R.; AHMAD, D.; MAN, H. C.; TAHERI, S. Review of optimum temperature, humidity, and vapour pressure deficit for microclimate evaluation and control in greenhouse cultivation of tomato: a review. International Agrophysics, v. 32, n. 2, p. 287-302, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2017-0005

SIDDIQUI, M. W.; AYALA-ZAVALA, J. F.; DHUA, R. S. Genotypic variation in tomatoes affecting processing and antioxidant attributes. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, v. 55, n. 13, p. 1819-1835, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.710278

TAMIM, S. A.; LI, F.; WANG, Y.; SHANG, L.; ZHANG, X.; TAO, J.; WANG, Y.; GAI, W.; DONG, H.; AHIAKPA, J. K.; MUMTAZ, M. A.; ZHANG, Y. Effect of shading on ascorbic acid accumulation and biosynthetic gene expression during tomato fruit development and ripening. Vegetable Research, v. 2, a01, 2022. https://doi.org/10.48130/vr-2022-0001

VALLAD, G. E.; MESSELINK, G.; SMITH, H. A. Crop protection: pest and disease management. Tomatoes, Wallingford: CABI, 2018. p. 207-257.

ZHAO, X.; LI, B.; ZHANG, Y.; ZHANG, S.; LIU, G.; LI, J. The plasma membrane aquaporin SlPIP2;11 alleviates the inhibition of photosynthesis in tomato under high VPD by refining stomatal morphology and enhancing antioxidant function. Plant Stress, v. 8, e101028, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2025.101028

Descargas

Publicado

2026-02-06

Número

Sección

Agronomia / Agronomy

Cómo citar

EFFICIENCY OF DIFFERENT ORGANZA MESH FOR TOMATO PRODUCTION UNDER A LOW TUNNEL. (2026). Nativa, 14(1), e20388. https://doi.org/10.31413/nat.v14i1.20388

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a